National Curriculum Standard Guidelines
- Interactive NCS Framework
- Laboratory Curriculum Framework
- Update on the Laboratory Curriculum Framework-Presentation at the Association of American Feed Control Officials, August 11, 2017
- Building a National Competency-Based Learning System for Food Officials, Food Safety Magazine, August/September 2016
- Interactive NCS Framework
- Laboratory Curriculum Framework
- Update on the Laboratory Curriculum Framework-Presentation at the Association of American Feed Control Officials, August 11, 2017
- Building a National Competency-Based Learning System for Food Officials, Food Safety Magazine, August/September 2016
National Curriculum Standards (NCS)
The NCS identifies the knowledge, skills, abilities and other attitudes or attributes (KSAO) with expected levels of performance to be able to conduct specific job activities or tasks.
It is the “backbone” in identifying what the training content needs to address, accomplish and the conditions necessary for Food Protection Professionals (FPPs) to be successful in their job. The IFSS NCS has been designed with four levels to align and sequence a training “path” from regulator onboarding through to the leadership of a regulatory program.
Entry Level
Newly hired or inexperienced local, state or federal FPPS (investigators and inspectors) who will be conducting regulatory inspections in retail food, manufactured food, animal food, milk, shellfish and/or produce operations. Upon completion of entry level training, it is expected that an individual would be able to conduct independent inspections within their program area.
Journey Level
FPPs who have completed their entry level training and are in the process of gaining their inspection and sampling experience, are provided with additional training for more advanced inspections (LACF, seafood HACCP or medicated feed inspections), investigations (foodborne illness, produce) and other activities (plan reviews, trace backs, recalls). These professionals would comprise the majority of the inspection workforce and perform most of the core food protection activities for their agency.
Technical Specialist
FPPSs with knowledge in a specific technical area, and who may or may not much field experience. These professionals are able to conduct complex, high-risk inspections and investigations, coordinate or convene key stakeholders in process development/improvement activities and engage in problem solving to remediate regulatory findings. These professionals are depended upon to provide assistance and specialized support to FPPs at the entry and journey levels.
Leadership Level
Food protection professionals who are seeking to be a supervisor, a current supervisor or upper-level administrators, and have a proven track record of excellence in all aspects of food protection. These professionals must be able to accurately design, improve, and prioritize food program functions and roles, and effectively communicate the role and value of food protection program activities to all levels within the organization as well as to external stakeholders. These professionals are often involved in strategic work planning and policy making for their department or agency and serve as mentors and role models for inspectors in their agencies.
Competency Modeling
The NCS expresses the knowledge, skills, abilities, attitudes and other attributes (KSAO) expected for the job and various tasks as “competency statements”. A competency statement explains what someone should be able “to do” or “know” in order to do the job or perform a task and to an identified proficiency level. They also:
- Identify a desired outcome, performance or behavioral expectation to which training should be developed to achieve
- Must be observable and measurable
- Involve a process that begins by drafting high level or broad competencies for a domain area and later drill down for more specific details
- Broad example: Explain the recall process
- Narrower example: Describe the factors used to make recall decisions
- Provide an outline for the course(s), as competency statements often evolve into course objectives
Competency modeling is a recognized method to identify the KSAOs necessary for the job that can be used to develop training (It is noteworthy that these competency statements could also be used for other purposes including developing or updating position descriptions or performance management). Through the utilization of validated methods for developing adult learning, the training content will be valid and defensible to prepare regulators to do their job.
Job Task Analysis (JTA)
It is a method to “deconstruct” the job and identify the duties, tasks and steps performed on a job as well as the knowledge, skills, and abilities that make up a job.
The JTA method is useful when a job or task has many steps to complete it. The competency modeling process can be advantageous to task analysis for jobs that require mostly cognitive functions to complete.
The competency statements and JTA are then utilized to draft the course design document (CDD) to then develop course content, story boards and then formatted for the delivery mode, participant and instructor manuals, and job aids.
Conclusion
Simply put, we need to be able to answer the question: “How do you know if your training is any good?”
The NCS provides a solid foundation and validated approach to not only say our training is good, but also that it addresses the training needs of Food Protection Professionals to ensure that the workforce is competent and performing comparable work across the nation.