Association of Food & Drug Officials
spacer
 
Search AFDO
 
 Execute Search 
 
spacer
Membership
undefined
undefined
spacer
Home
About
Awards
Committees
Conferences
Endowment Foundation
Food Security
HACCP Training
Membership
Position Statements
Publications
Resolutions
Resources
States Helping States
Training
Affiliates
Virtual Members
spacer
Association of Food & Drug Officials
 
ASSOCIATION OF FOOD AND DRUG OFFICIALS
Position Statement

UPDATED: Raw Milk and Raw Milk Products

Developed by the AFDO Food Committee
May 2, 2003
Revised by the AFDO Board of Directors
June 14, 2003

For over 106 years, the Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) has endeavored to create uniformity among government regulatory agencies at all levels. By building consensus with program managers at the state and local levels, AFDO is able to establish united positions on national food safety matters that affect all of us. It is in this spirit of uniformity that AFDO is pleased to offer our comments on mandatory pasteurization for milk and milk products.

AFDO supports mandatory pasteurization for all milk and milk products intended for direct human consumption except where alternative procedures to pasteurization are provided (i.e. curing of certain cheese varieties) to ensure the safety of finished products.

Raw milk has been known to be a vehicle for disease organisms for more than 100 years. Medical practitioners and public health officials have documented thousands of illnesses and deaths due to the consumption of tainted milk. Outbreaks associated with the consumption of raw milk routinely occur every year. Pathogenic organisms shed in the milk of apparently healthy animals have caused diseases such as brucellosis, campylobacterosis, salmonellosis and tuberculosis. Pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes and E. coli O157:H7 can also be introduced during and after milking and have been responsible for disease outbreaks.

Although some individuals or consumers extol the health benefits of raw milk, there is no objective evidence that milk pasteurization has any adverse effect on human nutrition or health. These individuals advance a number of arguments that allude to the health benefits of raw milk, but they are either anecdotal or unsupported by scientific fact, while it has been scientifically and repeatedly demonstrated that raw milk consumption represents a substantial risk of infectious disease.

The hazards of raw milk consumption are recognized by most states. Raw milk sold through commercial channels for human consumption is illegal in all or part of 42 states. Public health organizations such as the U.S. Animal Health Association, the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the House of Delegates of the American Veterinary Medical Association have adopted policy statements that milk for human consumption should be pasteurized.

Foodborne illnesses related to the consumption of fresh, soft, raw milk cheeses such as queso fresco and queso cotija point out the hazards of consuming raw milk products. These products are popular among people from societies where milk pasteurization is not as common as in the United States, and the product is distributed mainly through unregulated practices. While mandatory pasteurization requirements will not stop black market distribution, they will curtail mass distribution and facilitate raising the awareness of potential consumers.
Position Right
 
  • 2000 Paper

  • 2001 Papers

  • 2002 Papers

  • 2003 Papers

  • 2004 Papers

  • 2005 Papers

  • 2006 Papers
  •  
    2003 Papers
     

     

    2550 Kingston Road, Suite 311
    York, PA  17402
    717.757.2888    717.755.8089 (fax)
    E-mail: afdo@afdo.org
    ©2002-2006 Association of Food and Drug Officials